↓ Skip to main content

Early deep sedation is associated with decreased in-hospital and two-year follow-up survival

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early deep sedation is associated with decreased in-hospital and two-year follow-up survival
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0929-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix Balzer, Björn Weiß, Oliver Kumpf, Sascha Treskatsch, Claudia Spies, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Alexander Krannich, Marc Kastrup

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that deep sedation is detrimental to critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to examine effects of deep sedation during the early period after ICU admission on short- and long-term survival. In this observational, matched-pair analysis, patients with mechanical ventilation that were admitted to ICUs of a tertiary university hospital in six consecutive years were grouped as either lightly or deeply sedated within the first 48 hours after ICU admission. The Richmond-Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS) was used to assess sedation depth (light sedation: -2 to 0; deep: -3 or below). Multivariate Cox regression was conducted to investigate the impact of early deep sedation within the first 48 hours of admission on in-hospital and two-years follow-up survival. In total, 1,884 patients met inclusion criteria out of which 27.2% (n = 513) were deeply sedated. Deeply sedated patients had longer ventilation times, increased length of stay and higher rates of mortality. Early deep sedation was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.661 (95% CI: 1.074-2.567; p = 0.022) for in-hospital survival and 1.866 (95% CI: 1.351-2.576; p < 0.001) for two-years follow-up survival. Early deep sedation during the first 48 hours of intensive care treatment was associated with decreased in-hospital and two-years follow-up survival. Since early deep sedation is a modifiable risk factor, this data shows an urgent need for prospective clinical trials focusing on light sedation in the early phase of ICU treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Czechia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 15%
Other 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,437,796
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,264
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,789
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#82
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.