↓ Skip to main content

Impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a propensity score analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a propensity score analysis
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0924-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Venkatakrishna Rajajee, Craig A Williamson, Brady T West

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of real-time ultrasound guidance (RUSG) during Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy (PDT), including in patients with risk factors such as coagulopathy, cervical spine immobilization (CSI) and morbid obesity. Use of RUSG has been shown to improve the technical accuracy of PDT, however, it is unclear if there is an associated reduction in complications. Our objective was to determine whether the peri-procedural use of RUSG is associated with a reduction in complications of PDT using a propensity score analysis. This study reviewed all PDTs performed in a eight-year period in a neurocritical care unit. PDTs were typically performed by trainees under guidance of the attending intensivist. Bronchoscopic guidance was used for all procedures with addition of RUSG at the discretion of the attending physician. RUSG was used to guide endotracheal-tube withdrawal, guide tracheal puncture, identify guidewire entry level and confirm bilateral lung sliding. The primary outcome was a composite of previously defined complications including (among others) bleeding, infection, loss of airway, inability to complete procedure, need for revision, granuloma and early dislodgement. Propensity score analysis was used to ensure that the relationship of not using RUSG with the probability of an adverse outcome was examined within groups of patients having similar covariate profiles. Covariates included were age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis, APACHE-2 score, timing of tracheostomy, positive end-expiratory pressure and presence of risk factors including coagulopathy, CSI and prior tracheostomy. A total of 200 patients underwent PDT during the specified period, and 107 received RUSG. Risk factors for PDT were present in 63 (32%). There were 9 complications in the group without RUSG- bleeding (n = 4), need for revision related to inability to ventilate or dislodgement (n = 3) and symptomatic granuloma (n = 2). There was one complication in the RUSG group (early dislodgement). The odds of having an adverse outcome for patients receiving RUSG were significantly lower (OR 0.08, 95%CI 0.009-0.811, p = 0.032) than for those receiving a standard technique while holding the propensity score quartile fixed. The use of real time ultrasound guidance during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy was associated with a significant reduction in procedure-related complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
India 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 25 28%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,510
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,320
of 395,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#298
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.