↓ Skip to main content

UrQt: an efficient software for the Unsupervised Quality trimming of NGS data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
UrQt: an efficient software for the Unsupervised Quality trimming of NGS data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0546-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurent Modolo, Emmanuelle Lerat

Abstract

Quality control is a necessary step of any Next Generation Sequencing analysis. Although customary, this step still requires manual interventions to empirically choose tuning parameters according to various quality statistics. Moreover, current quality control procedures that provide a "good quality" data set, are not optimal and discard many informative nucleotides. To address these drawbacks, we present a new quality control method, implemented in UrQt software, for Unsupervised Quality trimming of Next Generation Sequencing reads. Our trimming procedure relies on a well-defined probabilistic framework to detect the best segmentation between two segments of unreliable nucleotides, framing a segment of informative nucleotides. Our software only requires one user-friendly parameter to define the minimal quality threshold (phred score) to consider a nucleotide to be informative, which is independent of both the experiment and the quality of the data. This procedure is implemented in C++ in an efficient and parallelized software with a low memory footprint. We tested the performances of UrQt compared to the best-known trimming programs, on seven RNA and DNA sequencing experiments and demonstrated its optimality in the resulting tradeoff between the number of trimmed nucleotides and the quality objective. By finding the best segmentation to delimit a segment of good quality nucleotides, UrQt greatly increases the number of reads and of nucleotides that can be retained for a given quality objective. UrQt source files, binary executables for different operating systems and documentation are freely available (under the GPLv3) at the following address: https://lbbe.univ-lyon1.fr/-UrQt-.html .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 4%
United States 2 2%
Sweden 2 2%
Ireland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 18%
Computer Science 8 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,097,273
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,528
of 7,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,010
of 265,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#22
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.