↓ Skip to main content

The role of red blood cells and cell-free hemoglobin in the pathogenesis of ARDS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of red blood cells and cell-free hemoglobin in the pathogenesis of ARDS
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40560-015-0086-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R Janz, Lorraine B Ware

Abstract

The primary focus of research into the pathophysiology of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been on the interaction between the lung, underlying causes of ARDS, and the role of white blood cells and platelets in contributing to lung injury. Given a lack of specific therapies for this common complication of critical illness, further insight into the pathophysiology of this syndrome is greatly needed to develop targeted interventions. The red blood cell (RBC) has been reported to undergo deleterious changes in critical illness and be present in the alveoli of patients with ARDS. Release of RBC contents is known to be injurious in other conditions but has only recently been studied in critical illness and ARDS. The contribution of the RBC to ARDS represents a new avenue of research that may produce new, targeted therapies for this deadly syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,540,818
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#180
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,634
of 271,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.