You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating range of influence in case of missing spatial data: a simulation study on binary data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-14-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristine Bihrmann, Annette K Ersbøll |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,759,600
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#149
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,968
of 358,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.