Review by Christopher I Hunter
The initial reviewers picked up many of the major points, and I have been asked to re-review only the revisions suggested by the original reviewer, which I have done (below), but in addition, there…
The initial reviewers picked up many of the major points, and I have been asked to re-review only the revisions suggested by the original reviewer, which I have done (below), but in addition, there…
Major revisions: The authors mention MINSEQE as a standard for describing a sequencing experiment, but then do not use it themselves in determining what should be in an SRA record. Some…
This article presents the current situation of annotation for SRA experiments. The authors claim that the annotation is poor, and I also agree with their conclusion. I expect their further works. …