↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Benefits and problems of electronic information exchange as perceived by health care professionals: an interview study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits and problems of electronic information exchange as perceived by health care professionals: an interview study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-256
Pubmed ID
21982395
Authors

Marieke Zwaanswijk, Robert A Verheij, Floris J Wiesman, Roland D Friele

Abstract

Various countries are currently implementing a national electronic patient record (n-EPR). Despite the assumed positive effects of n-EPRs, their overall adoption remains low and meets resistance from health care providers. This study aims to increase our understanding of health care providers' attitude towards the n-EPR, by investigating their perceptions of the benefits and problems of electronic information exchange in health care and the n-EPR in particular.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 169 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 23%
Computer Science 26 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 8%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 31 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2011.
All research outputs
#7,309,818
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,597
of 7,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,664
of 135,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#32
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.