↓ Skip to main content

Verification and validation of bioinformatics software without a gold standard: a case study of BWA and Bowtie

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Verification and validation of bioinformatics software without a gold standard: a case study of BWA and Bowtie
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-s16-s15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleni Giannoulatou, Shin-Ho Park, David T Humphreys, Joshua WK Ho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 21%
Computer Science 18 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,745,848
of 24,172,513 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#356
of 7,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,490
of 369,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#7
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,172,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.