You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The limitations of employment as a tool for social inclusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-621 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liana S Leach, Peter Butterworth, Lyndall Strazdins, Bryan Rodgers, Dorothy H Broom, Sarah C Olesen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 37% |
| Psychology | 10 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,595,825
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,822
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,457
of 113,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#7
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.