You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A close examination of double filtering with fold change and t test in microarray analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-402 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Song Zhang, Jing Cao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 33% |
| Researcher | 25 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,853
of 7,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,393
of 165,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#55
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.