↓ Skip to main content

Well-differentiated abdominal liposarcoma: experience of a tertiary care center

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Well-differentiated abdominal liposarcoma: experience of a tertiary care center
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12957-015-0580-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kursat Karadayi, Caglar Yildiz, Savas Karakus, Atilla Kurt, Birkan Bozkurt, Sinan Soylu, Ayse A Cicekli, Reyhan Egilmez, Ali Cetin

Abstract

We presented abdominal liposarcoma cases diagnosed and managed in a tertiary care center and also conducted a literature review on main features of this tumor. Chart reviews of eight cases were conducted, and clinical, surgical, histopathological, and follow-up data were recorded. Overall, complete surgical resection was performed with adjacent organ resection in 25% of cases, and radiotherapy was not administered. Recurrence was developed in only one case and died after 2 years and 3 months, and other cases are under follow-up without recurrence. Histopatological examinations revealed findings of well-differentiated liposarcoma. According to our surgical experience, the surgical margin positivity may not be a determining factor for the survival of patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma, and in the absence of macroscopic invasion, adjacent organ resection may not be required. Radiotherapy may not be preferred when complete resection of abdominal mass was achieved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Chemistry 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,876,301
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#52
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,904
of 264,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.