↓ Skip to main content

Differential SINE evolution in vesper and non-vesper bats

Overview of attention for article published in Mobile DNA, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential SINE evolution in vesper and non-vesper bats
Published in
Mobile DNA, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13100-015-0038-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Ray, Heidi JT Pagan, Roy N Platt, Ashley R Kroll, Sarah Schaack, Richard D Stevens

Abstract

Short interspersed elements (SINEs) have a powerful influence on genome evolution and can be useful markers for phylogenetic inference and population genetic analyses. In this study, we examined survey sequence and whole genome data to determine the evolutionary dynamics of Ves SINEs in the genomes of 11 bats, nine from Vespertilionidae. We identified 41 subfamilies of Ves and linked several to specific lineages. We also revealed substantial differences among lineages including the observation that Ves accumulation and Ves subfamily diversity is significantly higher in vesper as opposed to non-vesper bats. This is especially interesting when one considers the increased transposable element diversity of vesper bats in general. Our data suggest that survey sequencing and genome mining are valuable tools to investigate SINE evolution among related lineages and can provide substantial information about the ability of SINEs to proliferate in diverse genomes. This method would also be a useful first step in determining which subfamilies would be the best to target when developing SINEs as markers for phylogenetic and population genetic analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Norway 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,200,930
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Mobile DNA
#230
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,087
of 264,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mobile DNA
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.