↓ Skip to main content

Home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis and their carers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis and their carers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0695-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra Solari, Andrea Giordano, Maria Grazia Grasso, Paolo Confalonieri, Francesco Patti, Alessandra Lugaresi, Lucia Palmisano, Roberta Amadeo, Giovanni Martino, Michela Ponzio, Giuseppe Casale, Claudia Borreani, Renzo Causarano, Simone Veronese, Paola Zaratin, Mario Alberto Battaglia, on behalf of the PeNSAMI project

Abstract

Preliminary evidence suggests that palliative care may be useful for people with severe multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a home-based palliative approach (HPA) for people with severe MS and their carers. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial with a nested qualitative study. Seventy-five severe MS-carer dyads are being randomized (at three centers, one in each area of Italy) to HPA or usual care (UC) in a 2:1 ratio. Each center has a specially trained team consisting of four professionals (physician, nurse, psychologist, social worker). The team makes a comprehensive assessment of the needs of the dyads. HPA content is then agreed on, discussed with the patient's caring physician, and delivered over six months. The intervention is not intended to replace existing services. At later visits, the team checks the HPA delivery and reviews/modifies it as necessary. HPA and UC dyads are assessed at home by a blind examiner at baseline, and three and six months later; they also receive monthly telephone interviews. Dyads assigned to UC receive the examiner's visits and telephone interviews, but not the team visits. Primary outcome measures are changes in symptoms (Palliative care Outcome Scale-Symptoms-MS, POS-S-MS), and quality of life (the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), not assessed in patients with severe cognitive compromise) at three and six months. Other outcomes are changes in patient functional status and mood; changes in carer quality of life, mood and caregiving burden; costs; incorporation with standard care; unplanned hospital admissions; referrals to hospice; and deaths. The experience of participants will be evaluated qualitatively by individual semi-structured interviews (HPA patients and carers) and focus group meetings (HPA patients' caring physicians). The results of our study will show whether the HPA is feasible and beneficial to people with severe MS and their carers living in the three Italian geographic areas. The nested qualitative study will add to the understanding of the strengths and limitations of the intervention. The trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (identifier: ISRCTN73082124 ) on 19 June 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 56 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 18%
Psychology 15 8%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 66 35%