You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Costs and longer-term savings of parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder: a modelling study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-803 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eva-Maria Bonin, Madeleine Stevens, Jennifer Beecham, Sarah Byford, Michael Parsonage |
Abstract |
Conduct disorders are the most common psychiatric disorders in children and may persist into adulthood in about 50% of cases. The costs to society are high and impact many public sector agencies. Parenting programmes have been shown to positively affect child behaviour, but little is known about their potential long-term cost-effectiveness. We therefore estimate the costs of and longer-term savings from evidence-based parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 4 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 21% |
Researcher | 25 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 37 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 12% |
Unknown | 38 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,013,340
of 24,970,080 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,095
of 16,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,142
of 141,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.