↓ Skip to main content

Costs and longer-term savings of parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder: a modelling study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costs and longer-term savings of parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder: a modelling study
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva-Maria Bonin, Madeleine Stevens, Jennifer Beecham, Sarah Byford, Michael Parsonage

Abstract

Conduct disorders are the most common psychiatric disorders in children and may persist into adulthood in about 50% of cases. The costs to society are high and impact many public sector agencies. Parenting programmes have been shown to positively affect child behaviour, but little is known about their potential long-term cost-effectiveness. We therefore estimate the costs of and longer-term savings from evidence-based parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Social Sciences 16 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 26 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#658,118
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#653
of 11,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,187
of 110,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them