↓ Skip to main content

Costs and longer-term savings of parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder: a modelling study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costs and longer-term savings of parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder: a modelling study
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva-Maria Bonin, Madeleine Stevens, Jennifer Beecham, Sarah Byford, Michael Parsonage

Abstract

Conduct disorders are the most common psychiatric disorders in children and may persist into adulthood in about 50% of cases. The costs to society are high and impact many public sector agencies. Parenting programmes have been shown to positively affect child behaviour, but little is known about their potential long-term cost-effectiveness. We therefore estimate the costs of and longer-term savings from evidence-based parenting programmes for the prevention of persistent conduct disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Social Sciences 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,013,340
of 24,970,080 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,095
of 16,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,142
of 141,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.