↓ Skip to main content

Association between parenting practices and children's dietary intake, activity behavior and development of body mass index: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between parenting practices and children's dietary intake, activity behavior and development of body mass index: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica S Gubbels, Stef PJ Kremers, Annette Stafleu, Sanne I de Vries, R Alexandra Goldbohm, Pieter C Dagnelie, Nanne K de Vries, Stef van Buuren, Carel Thijs

Abstract

Insights into the effects of energy balance-related parenting practices on children's diet and activity behavior at an early age is warranted to determine which practices should be recommended and to whom. The purpose of this study was to examine child and parent background correlates of energy balance-related parenting practices at age 5, as well as the associations of these practices with children's diet, activity behavior, and body mass index (BMI) development.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 241 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 19%
Student > Bachelor 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 12%
Psychology 24 9%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 59 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,493,825
of 11,344,499 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,028
of 1,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,406
of 97,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,344,499 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.