↓ Skip to main content

Open Bibliography for Science, Technology, and Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Open Bibliography for Science, Technology, and Medicine
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-3-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Jones, Mark MacGillivray, Peter Murray-Rust, Jim Pitman, Peter Sefton, Ben O'Steen, William Waites

Abstract

The concept of Open Bibliography in science, technology and medicine (STM) is introduced as a combination of Open Source tools, Open specifications and Open bibliographic data. An Openly searchable and navigable network of bibliographic information and associated knowledge representations, a Bibliographic Knowledge Network, across all branches of Science, Technology and Medicine, has been designed and initiated. For this large scale endeavour, the engagement and cooperation of the multiple stakeholders in STM publishing - authors, librarians, publishers and administrators - is sought.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 5%
United States 2 4%
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Cuba 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 43 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 18 33%
Other 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 25%
Computer Science 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Chemistry 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 3 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,671,015
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#134
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,928
of 139,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.