↓ Skip to main content

Effect of ketogenic mediterranean diet with phytoextracts and low carbohydrates/high-protein meals on weight, cardiovascular risk factors, body composition and diet compliance in Italian council…

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
49 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of ketogenic mediterranean diet with phytoextracts and low carbohydrates/high-protein meals on weight, cardiovascular risk factors, body composition and diet compliance in Italian council employees
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Paoli, Lorenzo Cenci, Keith A Grimaldi

Abstract

There has been increased interest in recent years in very low carbohydrate ketogenic diets (VLCKD) that, even though they are much discussed and often opposed, have undoubtedly been shown to be effective, at least in the short to medium term, as a tool to tackle obesity, hyperlipidemia and some cardiovascular risk factors. For this reason the ketogenic diet represents an interesting option but unfortunately suffers from a low compliance. The aim of this pilot study is to ascertain the safety and effects of a modified ketogenic diet that utilizes ingredients which are low in carbohydrates but are formulated to simulate its aspect and taste and also contain phytoextracts to add beneficial effects of important vegetable components.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 19%
Student > Master 38 16%
Other 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 46 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 11%
Sports and Recreations 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 59 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#658,867
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#197
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,620
of 136,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.