↓ Skip to main content

Genetic characterization of H1N2 influenza a virus isolated from sick pigs in Southern China in 2010

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic characterization of H1N2 influenza a virus isolated from sick pigs in Southern China in 2010
Published in
Virology Journal, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-8-469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Li Kong, Liang Zong Huang, Hai Tao Qi, Nan Cao, Liang Quan Zhang, Heng Wang, Shang Song Guan, Wen Bao Qi, Pei Rong Jiao, Ming Liao, Gui Hong Zhang

Abstract

In China H3N2 and H1N1 swine influenza viruses have been circulating for many years. In January 2010, before swine were infected with foot and mouth disease in Guangdong, some pigs have shown flu-like symptoms: cough, sneeze, runny nose and fever. We collected the nasopharyngeal swab of all sick pigs as much as possible. One subtype H1N2 influenza viruses were isolated from the pig population. The complete genome of one isolate, designated A/swine/Guangdong/1/2010(H1N2), was sequenced and compared with sequences available in GenBank. The nucleotide sequences of all eight viral RNA segments were determined, and then phylogenetic analysis was performed using the neighbor-joining method. HA, NP, M and NS were shown to be closely to swine origin. PB2 and PA were close to avian origin, but NA and PB1were close to human origin. It is a result of a multiple reassortment event. In conclusion, our finding provides further evidence about the interspecies transmission of avian influenza viruses to pigs and emphasizes the importance of reinforcing swine influenza virus (SIV) surveillance, especially before the emergence of highly pathogenic FMDs in pigs in Guangdong.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Professor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2011.
All research outputs
#6,375,151
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#680
of 3,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,224
of 135,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#19
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.