You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Arabidopsis seedling flood-inoculation technique: a rapid and reliable assay for studying plant-bacterial interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-7-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuhiro Ishiga, Takako Ishiga, Srinivasa R Uppalapati, Kirankumar S Mysore |
| Abstract |
The Arabidopsis thaliana-Pseudomonas syringae model pathosystem is one of the most widely used systems to understand the mechanisms of microbial pathogenesis and plant innate immunity. Several inoculation methods have been used to study plant-pathogen interactions in this model system. However, none of the methods reported to date are similar to those occurring in nature and amicable to large-scale mutant screens. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 265 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 29% |
| Researcher | 64 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 171 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,105,565
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#363
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,389
of 133,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them