↓ Skip to main content

A pair of new BAC and BIBAC vectors that facilitate BAC/BIBAC library construction and intact large genomic DNA insert exchange

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pair of new BAC and BIBAC vectors that facilitate BAC/BIBAC library construction and intact large genomic DNA insert exchange
Published in
Plant Methods, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-7-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xue Shi, Haiyang Zeng, Yadong Xue, Meizhong Luo

Abstract

Large-insert BAC and BIBAC libraries are important tools for structural and functional genomics studies of eukaryotic genomes. To facilitate the construction of BAC and BIBAC libraries and the transfer of complete large BAC inserts into BIBAC vectors, which is desired in positional cloning, we developed a pair of new BAC and BIBAC vectors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 81%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,289,552
of 18,851,697 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#307
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,688
of 114,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,851,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them