↓ Skip to main content

The growing caseload of chronic life-long conditions calls for a move towards full self-management in low-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The growing caseload of chronic life-long conditions calls for a move towards full self-management in low-income countries
Published in
Globalization and Health, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-7-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josefien van Olmen, Grace Marie Ku, Raoul Bermejo, Guy Kegels, Katharina Hermann, Wim Van Damme

Abstract

The growing caseload caused by patients with chronic life-long conditions leads to increased needs for health care providers and rising costs of health services, resulting in a heavy burden on health systems, populations and individuals. The professionalised health care for chronic patients common in high income countries is very labour-intensive and expensive. Moreover, the outcomes are often poor. In low-income countries, the scarce resources and the lack of quality and continuity of health care result in high health care expenditure and very poor health outcomes. The current proposals to improve care for chronic patients in low-income countries are still very much provider-centred.The aim of this paper is to show that present provider-centred models of chronic care are not adequate and to propose 'full self-management' as an alternative for low-income countries, facilitated by expert patient networks and smart phone technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 22%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 34%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Computer Science 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,115,581
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#349
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,443
of 148,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.