You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: when are antibiotics indicated? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-8-30 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Milo A Puhan, Daniela Vollenweider, Tsogyal Latshang, Johann Steurer, Claudia Steurer-Stey |
Abstract |
For decades, there is an unresolved debate about adequate prescription of antibiotics for patients suffering from exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this systematic review was to analyse randomised controlled trials investigating the clinical benefit of antibiotics for COPD exacerbations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 19% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
Professor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 30% |
Unknown | 7 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 68% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,713,861
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#993
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,466
of 90,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.