↓ Skip to main content

The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): New challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 199)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): New challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2007
DOI 10.1186/1747-5341-2-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph L Verheijde, Mohamed Y Rady, Joan L McGregor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,323,630
of 17,443,211 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#43
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,112
of 241,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,443,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them