You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic review of safety and tolerability of a complex micronutrient formula used in mental health
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-11-62 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J Steven A Simpson, Susan G Crawford, Estelle T Goldstein, Catherine Field, Ellen Burgess, Bonnie J Kaplan |
Abstract |
Theoretically, consumption of complex, multinutrient formulations of vitamins and minerals should be safe, as most preparations contain primarily the nutrients that have been in the human diet for millennia, and at safe levels as defined by the Dietary Reference Intakes. However, the safety profile of commercial formulae may differ from foods because of the amounts and combinations of nutrients they contain. As these complex formulae are being studied and used clinically with increasing frequency, there is a need for direct evaluation of safety and tolerability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Germany | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Librarian | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
Psychology | 9 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,844,465
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,983
of 4,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,518
of 109,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.