↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of safety and tolerability of a complex micronutrient formula used in mental health

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of safety and tolerability of a complex micronutrient formula used in mental health
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-11-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Steven A Simpson, Susan G Crawford, Estelle T Goldstein, Catherine Field, Ellen Burgess, Bonnie J Kaplan

Abstract

Theoretically, consumption of complex, multinutrient formulations of vitamins and minerals should be safe, as most preparations contain primarily the nutrients that have been in the human diet for millennia, and at safe levels as defined by the Dietary Reference Intakes. However, the safety profile of commercial formulae may differ from foods because of the amounts and combinations of nutrients they contain. As these complex formulae are being studied and used clinically with increasing frequency, there is a need for direct evaluation of safety and tolerability.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Librarian 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Psychology 9 12%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,450,609
of 21,328,399 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,872
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,787
of 120,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,328,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them