↓ Skip to main content

Lycium barbarum polysaccharide protects HSF cells against ultraviolet-induced damage through the activation of Nrf2

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lycium barbarum polysaccharide protects HSF cells against ultraviolet-induced damage through the activation of Nrf2
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s11658-018-0084-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bihua Liang, Liqian Peng, Runxiang Li, Huaping Li, Ziyin Mo, Xinyue Dai, Na Jiang, Qing Liu, Erting Zhang, Huiyan Deng, Zhenjie Li, Huilan Zhu

Abstract

Lycium barbarum polysaccharide (LBP) is considered an antioxidant agent. NF-E2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) is an important regulator for protection against UV damage. In this study, we verified the performance of LBP and the correlation between LBP and Nrf2. HSF cells were treated with LBP to determine dose and time dependencies. An antioxidant response element (ARE) reporter was designed to monitor the activity of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway. For HSF cells, the optimal LBP treatment was 300 μg/ml for 3 h. The ARE-reporter assay showed that LBP could increase the robustness of p-Nrf2. Treatments with genistein and LY294002 reduced of nuclear p-Nrf2 after 24 h. LBP increased the level of nuclear Nrf2, which functions by both phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. Silencing Nrf2 led to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, lower cell viability, and decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSP-PX) levels. This induced a higher level of lipid peroxide (LPO). However, LBP could decrease the levels of ROS and LPO and enhance the levels of SOD and GSP-PX. LBP protects HSF cells against UV damage via the regulation of Nrf2.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,711,989
of 17,866,836 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#109
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,770
of 286,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,866,836 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them