↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0630-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofie HM Manders, Wietske Kievit, Eddy Adang, Herman L Brus, Hein J Bernelot Moens, Andre Hartkamp, Lidy Hendriks, Elisabeth Brouwer, Henk Visser, Harald E Vonkeman, Jos Hendrikx, Tim L Jansen, Rene Westhovens, Mart AFJ van de Laar, Piet LCM van Riel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 137 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Researcher 21 15%
Other 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 32 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,527
of 3,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,018
of 283,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#32
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.