↓ Skip to main content

Rapid determination of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance from whole-genome sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
332 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid determination of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance from whole-genome sequences
Published in
Genome Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13073-015-0164-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesc Coll, Ruth McNerney, Mark D Preston, José Afonso Guerra-Assunção, Andrew Warry, Grant Hill-Cawthorne, Kim Mallard, Mridul Nair, Anabela Miranda, Adriana Alves, João Perdigão, Miguel Viveiros, Isabel Portugal, Zahra Hasan, Rumina Hasan, Judith R Glynn, Nigel Martin, Arnab Pain, Taane G Clark

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance (DR) challenges effective tuberculosis disease control. Current molecular tests examine limited numbers of mutations, and although whole genome sequencing approaches could fully characterise DR, data complexity has restricted their clinical application. A library (1,325 mutations) predictive of DR for 15 anti-tuberculosis drugs was compiled and validated for 11 of them using genomic-phenotypic data from 792 strains. A rapid online 'TB-Profiler' tool was developed to report DR and strain-type profiles directly from raw sequences. Using our DR mutation library, in silico diagnostic accuracy was superior to some commercial diagnostics and alternative databases. The library will facilitate sequence-based drug-susceptibility testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Zambia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 434 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 17%
Student > Master 68 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 7%
Student > Postgraduate 30 7%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 101 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 99 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 45 10%
Computer Science 15 3%
Other 46 10%
Unknown 117 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#607,589
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#115
of 1,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,891
of 272,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.