↓ Skip to main content

A detailed report of the resource use and costs associated with implementation of a short stay programme for breast cancer surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A detailed report of the resource use and costs associated with implementation of a short stay programme for breast cancer surgery
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0270-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie M.C. Ament, Mascha de Kok, Cornelis J.H. van de Velde, Jan A. Roukema, Toine V.R.J. Bell, Fred W. van der Ent, Trudy van der Weijden, Maarten F. von Meyenfeldt, Carmen D. Dirksen

Abstract

Despite the increased attention for assessing the effectiveness of implementation strategies, most implementation studies provide little or no information on its associated costs. The focus of the current study was to provide a detailed report of the resource use and costs associated with implementation of a short stay programme for breast cancer surgery in four Dutch hospitals. The analysis was performed alongside a multi-centre implementation study. The process of identification, measurement and valuation of the implementation activities was based on recommendations for the design, analysis and reporting of health technology assessments. A scoring form was developed to prospectively determine the implementation activities at professional and implementation expert level. A time horizon of 5 years was used to calculate the implementation costs per patient. Identified activities were consisted of development and execution of the implementation strategy during the implementation project. Total implementation costs over the four hospitals were €83.293. Mean implementation costs, calculated for 660 patients treated over a period of 5 years, were €25 per patient. Subgroup analyses showed that the implementation costs ranged from €3.942 to €32.000 on hospital level. From a local hospital perspective, overall implementation costs were €21 per patient, after exclusion of the costs made by the expert centre. We provided a detailed case description of how implementation costs can be determined. Notable differences in implementation costs between hospitals were observed. ISRCTN: ISRCTN77253391.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Unspecified 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Unspecified 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,234,930
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,080
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,803
of 266,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#34
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.