You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation and pharmacovigilance of projects promoting cultivation and local use of Artemisia annua for malaria
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-84 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Merlin L Willcox, Shelly Burton, Rosalia Oyweka, Rehema Namyalo, Simon Challand, Keith Lindsey |
Abstract |
Several non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are promoting the use of Artemisia annua teas as a home-based treatment for malaria in situations where conventional treatments are not available. There has been controversy about the effectiveness and safety of this approach, but no pharmacovigilance studies or evaluations have been published to date. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#2,796,778
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#650
of 5,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,128
of 108,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.