↓ Skip to main content

Mirinho: An efficient and general plant and animal pre-miRNA predictor for genomic and deep sequencing data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mirinho: An efficient and general plant and animal pre-miRNA predictor for genomic and deep sequencing data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-015-0594-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Higashi, Cyril Fournier, Christian Gautier, Christine Gaspin, Marie-France Sagot

Abstract

Several methods exist for the prediction of precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) in genomic or sRNA-seq (small RNA sequences) data produced by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing). One key information used for this task is the characteristic hairpin structure adopted by pre-miRNAs, that in general are identified using RNA folders whose complexity is cubic in the size of the input. The vast majority of pre-miRNA predictors then rely on further information learned from previously validated miRNAs from the same or a closely related genome for the final prediction of new miRNAs. With this paper, we wished to address three main issues. The first was methodological and aimed at obtaining a more time-efficient predictor, however without losing in accuracy which represented a second issue. We indeed aimed at better predicting miRNAs at a genome scale, but also from sRNAseq data where in some cases, notably of plants, the current folding methods often infer the wrong structure. The third issue is related to the fact that it is important to rely as little as possible on previously recorded examples of miRNAs. We therefore also sought a method that is less dependent on previous miRNA records. As concerns the first and second issues, we present a novel alternative to a classical folder based on a thermodynamic Nearest-Neighbour (NN) model for computing the free energy and predicting the classical hairpin structure of a pre-miRNA. We show that the free energies thus computed correlate well with those of RNAFOLD. This novel method, called MIRINHO, has quadratic instead of cubic complexity and is much more efficient also in practice. When applied to sRNAseq data of plants, it gives in general better results than classical folders. On the third issue, we show that MIRINHO, which uses as only knowledge the length of the loops and stem-arms and the free energy of the pre-miRNA hairpin, compares well with algorithms that require more information. The results, obtained with different datasets, are indeed similar to those of other approaches with which such a comparison was possible. These needed to be publicly available softwares that could be used on a large input. In some cases, MIRINHO is even better in terms of sensitivity or precision. We provide a simpler and much faster method with very reasonable sensitivity and precision, which can be applied without special adaptation to the prediction of both animal and plant pre-miRNAs, using as input either genomic sequences or sRNA-seq data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 4%
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 42 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 8 17%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 46%
Computer Science 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,369,604
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#643
of 7,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,854
of 268,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#11
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.