You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The integration of the treatment for common mental disorders in primary care: experiences of health care providers in the MANAS trial in Goa, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-5-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernadette Pereira, Gracy Andrew, Sulochana Pednekar, Betty R Kirkwood, Vikram Patel |
| Abstract |
The MANAS trial reported that a Lay Health Counsellor (LHC) led collaborative stepped care intervention (the "MANAS intervention") for Common Mental Disorders (CMD) was effective in public sector primary care clinics but private sector General Practitioners (GPs) did as well with or without the additional counsellor. This paper aims to describe the experiences of integrating the MANAS intervention in primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,873,980
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#74
of 714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,529
of 132,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them