↓ Skip to main content

Comparative proteome analysis of psychrophilic versus mesophilic bacterial species: Insights into the molecular basis of cold adaptation of proteins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative proteome analysis of psychrophilic versus mesophilic bacterial species: Insights into the molecular basis of cold adaptation of proteins
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-10-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raghu Prasad Rao Metpally, Boojala Vijay B Reddy

Abstract

Cold adapted or psychrophilic organisms grow at low temperatures, where most of other organisms cannot grow. This adaptation requires a vast array of sequence, structural and physiological adjustments. To understand the molecular basis of cold adaptation of proteins, we analyzed proteomes of psychrophilic and mesophilic bacterial species and compared the differences in amino acid composition and substitution patterns to investigate their likely association with growth temperatures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Uruguay 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 164 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 29%
Student > Master 34 19%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 39 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2009.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,379
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,237
of 183,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#5
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.