↓ Skip to main content

Genetic deletion of muscle RANK or selective inhibition of RANKL is not as effective as full-length OPG-fc in mitigating muscular dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic deletion of muscle RANK or selective inhibition of RANKL is not as effective as full-length OPG-fc in mitigating muscular dystrophy
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40478-018-0533-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien S. Dufresne, Antoine Boulanger-Piette, Sabrina Bossé, Anteneh Argaw, Dounia Hamoudi, Laetitia Marcadet, Daniel Gamu, Val A. Fajardo, Hideo Yagita, Josef M. Penninger, A. Russell Tupling, Jérôme Frenette

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,240,993
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#946
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,201
of 326,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.