↓ Skip to main content

Genes2WordCloud: a quick way to identify biological themes from gene lists and free text

Overview of attention for article published in Source Code for Biology and Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genes2WordCloud: a quick way to identify biological themes from gene lists and free text
Published in
Source Code for Biology and Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1751-0473-6-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Baroukh, Sherry L Jenkins, Ruth Dannenfelser, Avi Ma'ayan

Abstract

Word-clouds recently emerged on the web as a solution for quickly summarizing text by maximizing the display of most relevant terms about a specific topic in the minimum amount of space. As biologists are faced with the daunting amount of new research data commonly presented in textual formats, word-clouds can be used to summarize and represent biological and/or biomedical content for various applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 59 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Other 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 26%
Computer Science 9 14%
Arts and Humanities 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,123,643
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#58
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,980
of 135,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them