↓ Skip to main content

Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 42/40 ratio in clinical setting of memory centers: a multicentric study

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 42/40 ratio in clinical setting of memory centers: a multicentric study
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13195-015-0114-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Dumurgier, Susanna Schraen, Audrey Gabelle, Olivier Vercruysse, Stéphanie Bombois, Jean-Louis Laplanche, Katell Peoc’h, Bernard Sablonnière, Ksenia V Kastanenka, Constance Delaby, Florence Pasquier, Jacques Touchon, Jacques Hugon, Claire Paquet, Sylvain Lehmann

Abstract

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid-β (Aβ), tau and phosphorylated tau (p-tau181) are now used for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Aβ40 is the most abundant Aβ peptide isoform in the CSF, and the Aβ 42/40 ratio has been proposed to better reflect brain amyloid production. However, its additional value in the clinical setting remains uncertain. A total of 367 subjects with cognitive disorders who underwent a lumbar puncture were prospectively included at three French memory centers (Paris-North, Lille and Montpellier; the PLM Study). The frequency of positive, negative and indeterminate CSF profiles were assessed by various methods, and their adequacies with the diagnosis of clinicians were tested using net reclassification improvement (NRI) analyses. On the basis of local optimum cutoffs for Aβ42 and p-tau181, 22% of the explored patients had indeterminate CSF profiles. The systematic use of Aβ 42/40 ratio instead of Aβ42 levels alone decreased the number of indeterminate profiles (17%; P = 0.03), but it failed to improve the classification of subjects (NRI = -2.1%; P = 0.64). In contrast, the use of Aβ 42/40 ratio instead of Aβ42 levels alone in patients with a discrepancy between p-tau181 and Aβ42 led to a reduction by half of the number of indeterminate profiles (10%; P < 0.001) and was further in agreement with clinician diagnosis (NRI = 10.5%; P = 0.003). In patients with a discrepancy between CSF p-tau181 and CSF Aβ42, the assessment of Aβ 42/40 ratio led to a reliable biological conclusion in over 50% of cases that agreed with a clinician's diagnosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 105 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,175,033
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#905
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,382
of 267,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.