You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PSMA-PET based radiotherapy: a review of initial experiences, survey on current practice and future perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-018-1047-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Zschaeck, Fabian Lohaus, Marcus Beck, Gregor Habl, Stephanie Kroeze, Constantinos Zamboglou, Stefan Alexander Koerber, Jürgen Debus, Tobias Hölscher, Peter Wust, Ute Ganswindt, Alexander D. J. Baur, Klaus Zöphel, Nikola Cihoric, Matthias Guckenberger, Stephanie E. Combs, Anca Ligia Grosu, Pirus Ghadjar, Claus Belka |
| Abstract |
68Gallium prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography (PET) is an increasingly used imaging modality in prostate cancer, especially in cases of tumor recurrence after curative intended therapy. Owed to the novelty of the PSMA-targeting tracers, clinical evidence on the value of PSMA-PET is moderate but rapidly increasing. State of the art imaging is pivotal for radiotherapy treatment planning as it may affect dose prescription, target delineation and use of concomitant therapy.This review summarizes the evidence on PSMA-PET imaging from a radiation oncologist's point of view. Additionally a short survey containing twelve examples of patients and 6 additional questions was performed in seven mayor academic centers with experience in PSMA ligand imaging and the findings are reported here. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 13% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,287,384
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#282
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,866
of 325,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.