You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding and using the meaning of statements in a bio-ontology: recasting the Gene Ontology in OWL
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-8-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mikel Egaña Aranguren, Sean Bechhofer, Phillip Lord, Ulrike Sattler, Robert Stevens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 95 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 35 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,024
of 7,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,221
of 76,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.