↓ Skip to main content

A novel mutation in the COL2A1 gene in a patient with Stickler syndrome type 1: a case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel mutation in the COL2A1 gene in a patient with Stickler syndrome type 1: a case report and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1396-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yousuke Higuchi, Kosei Hasegawa, Miho Yamashita, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Hirokazu Tsukahara

Abstract

Stickler syndrome is a group of collagenopathies characterized by ophthalmic, skeletal, and orofacial abnormalities, with the degree of symptoms varying among patients. Mutations in the COL2A1, COL11A1, and COL11A2 procollagen genes cause Stickler syndrome. Marshall syndrome, caused by a COL11A1 mutation, has clinical overlap with Stickler syndrome. A 2-year-old Japanese boy was presented to our hospital with short stature (79.1 cm, -2.52 standard deviation). His past medical history was significant for soft cleft palate and bilateral cataracts. He had a flat midface, micrognathia, and limitations in bilateral elbow flexion. Radiographs showed mild spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia. Initially, we suspected Marshall syndrome, but no mutation was identified in COL11A1. At 8 years old, his height was 116.2 cm (-1.89 standard deviation), and his orofacial characteristics appeared unremarkable. We analyzed the COL2A1 gene and found a novel heterozygous mutation (c.1142 G > A, p.Gly381Asp). In this case report, we identify a novel missense mutation in the COL2A1 gene in a patient with Stickler syndrome type 1, and we describe age-related changes in the clinical phenotype with regard to orofacial characteristics and height. Genetic analysis is helpful for the diagnosis of this clinically variable and genetically heterogeneous disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,609,054
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,278
of 3,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,674
of 316,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#31
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,951 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.