You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0275-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clair Le Boutillier, Agnes Chevalier, Vanessa Lawrence, Mary Leamy, Victoria J Bird, Rob Macpherson, Julie Williams, Mike Slade |
| Abstract |
Mental health policy is for staff to transform their practice towards a recovery orientation. Staff understanding of recovery-orientated practice will influence the implementation of this policy. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of empirical studies identifying clinician and manager conceptualisations of recovery-orientated practice. A systematic review of empirical primary research was conducted. Data sources were online databases (n = 8), journal table of contents (n = 5), internet, expert consultation (n = 13), reference lists of included studies and references to included studies. Narrative synthesis was used to integrate the findings. A total of 10,125 studies were screened, 245 full papers were retrieved, and 22 were included (participants, n = 1163). The following three conceptualisations of recovery-orientated practice were identified: clinical recovery, personal recovery and service-defined recovery. Service-defined recovery is a new conceptualisation which translates recovery into practice according to the goals and financial needs of the organisation. Organisational priorities influence staff understanding of recovery support. This influence is leading to the emergence of an additional meaning of recovery. The impact of service-led approaches to operationalising recovery-orientated practice has not been evaluated. The protocol for the review was pre-registered (PROSPERO 2013: CRD42013005942 ). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 36% |
| Canada | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,604,814
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#276
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,611
of 282,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.