↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part I: quantitative studies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
761 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
840 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part I: quantitative studies
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-3-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Rasmussen, Rikke Krølner, Knut-Inge Klepp, Leslie Lytle, Johannes Brug, Elling Bere, Pernille Due

Abstract

In order to more effectively promote fruit and vegetable intake among children and adolescents, insight into determinants of intake is necessary. We conducted a review of the literature for potential determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in children and adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 840 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 812 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 171 20%
Student > Bachelor 122 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 13%
Researcher 80 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 4%
Other 135 16%
Unknown 188 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 128 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 113 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 12%
Social Sciences 92 11%
Psychology 49 6%
Other 125 15%
Unknown 236 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#480,364
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#130
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#676
of 95,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.