↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part II: qualitative studies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
553 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part II: qualitative studies
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rikke Krølner, Mette Rasmussen, Johannes Brug, Knut-Inge Klepp, Marianne Wind, Pernille Due

Abstract

Large proportions of children do not fulfil the World Health Organization recommendation of eating at least 400 grams of fruit and vegetables (FV) per day. To promote an increased FV intake among children it is important to identify factors which influence their consumption. Both qualitative and quantitative studies are needed. Earlier reviews have analysed evidence from quantitative studies. The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review of qualitative studies of determinants of children's FV intake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 536 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 19%
Student > Bachelor 82 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 13%
Researcher 55 10%
Other 19 3%
Other 93 17%
Unknown 126 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 12%
Social Sciences 64 12%
Psychology 27 5%
Other 78 14%
Unknown 148 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#586,929
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#168
of 2,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,212
of 149,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.