↓ Skip to main content

Does point-of-care ultrasonography cause discomfort in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms?

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does point-of-care ultrasonography cause discomfort in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms?
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13049-015-0127-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian B. Laursen, Erik Sloth, Annmarie Touborg Lassen, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen, Jess Lambrechtsen, Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen, Poul Henning Madsen, Finn Rasmussen

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the patient-rated level of discomfort during point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) of the heart, lungs and deep veins in a population of patients admitted to an ED with respiratory symptoms and to what extent the patients would accept being assessed by the use of POCUS if they had to be examined for possible disease. A questionnaire-based observational study was conducted in an ED. Inclusion criteria were one or more of the following: respiratory rate > 20/min, oxygen saturation < 95 %, oxygen therapy initiated, dyspnoea, cough or chest pain. Patients were examined by the use of POCUS of the heart, lungs and deep veins. Patient-rated level of discomfort and acceptance were assessed using a standardised questionnaire. The median duration of the sonographic examinations was 12 min (IQR 11-13, range 9-23). The median patient-rated level of discomfort for all three types of POCUS was 1 (IQR 1-1, range 1-8) on a scale from 1 to 10. All but one patient (99.6 % (95 % CI: 98.9-100 %)), would accept being examined by the use of POCUS as a part of routine ED diagnostics. The patient-rated level of discomfort during POCUS of the heart, lungs and deep veins is very low and the vast majority of patients would accept being assessed by the use of POCUS if the patients once again had to be examined for possible disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Other 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,336,434
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#1,016
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,877
of 264,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.