You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impacts of feral horses on a desert environment
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-9-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stacey D Ostermann-Kelm, Edward A Atwill, Esther S Rubin, Larry E Hendrickson, Walter M Boyce |
Abstract |
Free-ranging horses (Equus caballus) in North America are considered to be feral animals since they are descendents of non-native domestic horses introduced to the continent. We conducted a study in a southern California desert to understand how feral horse movements and horse feces impacted this arid ecosystem. We evaluated five parameters susceptible to horse trampling: soil strength, vegetation cover, percent of nonnative vegetation, plant species diversity, and macroinvertebrate abundance. We also tested whether or not plant cover and species diversity were affected by the presence of horse feces. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 23% |
Student > Master | 14 | 22% |
Researcher | 11 | 17% |
Professor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 51% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 20% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,206,829
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,059
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,719
of 106,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.