You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retinal waves are unlikely to instruct the formation of eye-specific retinogeniculate projections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neural Development, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8104-4-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leo M Chalupa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Belarus | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 30% |
| Researcher | 19 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 45% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#54
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,395
of 122,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them