↓ Skip to main content

Retinal waves are unlikely to instruct the formation of eye-specific retinogeniculate projections

Overview of attention for article published in Neural Development, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 223)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retinal waves are unlikely to instruct the formation of eye-specific retinogeniculate projections
Published in
Neural Development, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1749-8104-4-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leo M Chalupa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Belarus 1 1%
Unknown 60 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 31%
Researcher 19 28%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 46%
Neuroscience 16 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Mathematics 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,887,601
of 21,956,218 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#45
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,949
of 251,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,956,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them