↓ Skip to main content

A cost-effectiveness study of caesarean-section deliveries by clinical officers, general practitioners and obstetricians in Burkina Faso

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cost-effectiveness study of caesarean-section deliveries by clinical officers, general practitioners and obstetricians in Burkina Faso
Published in
Human Resources for Health, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-7-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sennen H Hounton, David Newlands, Nicolas Meda, Vincent De Brouwere

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 23%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 41%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#627
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,115
of 97,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.