You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic validation of predicted microRNAs for cyclin D1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-9-194 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiong Jiang, Ming-Guang Feng, Yin-Yuan Mo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 27% |
| Researcher | 17 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,062
of 8,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,411
of 110,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#20
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.