↓ Skip to main content

World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Anaphylaxis

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 907)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
44 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
685 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
706 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Anaphylaxis
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1097/wox.0b013e318211496c
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Estelle R. Simons, Ledit R.F. Ardusso, M. Beatrice Bilò, Yehia M. El-Gamal, Dennis K. Ledford, Johannes Ring, Mario Sanchez-Borges, Gian Enrico Senna, Aziz Sheikh, Bernard Y. Thong, the World Allergy Organization

Abstract

The illustrated World Allergy Organization (WAO) Anaphylaxis Guidelines were created in response to absence of global guidelines for anaphylaxis. Uniquely, before they were developed, lack of worldwide availability of essentials for the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis was documented. They incorporate contributions from more than 100 allergy/immunology specialists on 6 continents. Recommendations are based on the best evidence available, supported by references published to the end of December 2010. The Guidelines review patient risk factors for severe or fatal anaphylaxis, co-factors that amplify anaphylaxis, and anaphylaxis in vulnerable patients, including pregnant women, infants, the elderly, and those with cardiovascular disease. They focus on the supreme importance of making a prompt clinical diagnosis and on the basic initial treatment that is urgently needed and should be possible even in a low resource environment. This involves having a written emergency protocol and rehearsing it regularly; then, as soon as anaphylaxis is diagnosed, promptly and simultaneously calling for help, injecting epinephrine (adrenaline) intramuscularly, and placing the patient on the back or in a position of comfort with the lower extremities elevated. When indicated, additional critically important steps include administering supplemental oxygen and maintaining the airway, establishing intravenous access and giving fluid resuscitation, and initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation with continuous chest compressions. Vital signs and cardiorespiratory status should be monitored frequently and regularly (preferably, continuously). The Guidelines briefly review management of anaphylaxis refractory to basic initial treatment. They also emphasize preparation of the patient for self-treatment of anaphylaxis recurrences in the community, confirmation of anaphylaxis triggers, and prevention of recurrences through trigger avoidance and immunomodulation. Novel strategies for dissemination and implementation are summarized. A global agenda for anaphylaxis research is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 706 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Colombia 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 680 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 138 20%
Researcher 81 11%
Other 74 10%
Student > Master 64 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 6%
Other 148 21%
Unknown 156 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 350 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 3%
Other 66 9%
Unknown 181 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#635,821
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#21
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,112
of 122,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.