↓ Skip to main content

Applying the quality improvement collaborative method to process redesign: a multiple case study

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying the quality improvement collaborative method to process redesign: a multiple case study
Published in
Implementation Science, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-5-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leti Vos, Michel LA Dückers, Cordula Wagner, Godefridus G van Merode

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Sierra Leone 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 12 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,774,251
of 5,234,318 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#727
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,241
of 178,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#43
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,234,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.