↓ Skip to main content

Primo software as a tool for Monte Carlo simulations of intensity modulated radiotherapy: a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primo software as a tool for Monte Carlo simulations of intensity modulated radiotherapy: a feasibility study
Published in
Radiation Oncology, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13014-018-1021-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Esposito, Sofia Silva, Jorge Oliveira, Joana Lencart, João Santos

Abstract

IMRT provides higher dose conformation to the target and dose sparing to surrounding tissues than 3DCRT. Monte Carlo method in Medical Physics is not a novelty to approach dosimetric problems. A new PENELOPE based code named PRIMO recently was published. The most intriguing features of PRIMO are the user-friendly approach, the stand-alone property and the built-in definition of different linear accelerators models. Nevertheless, IMRT simulations are not yet implemented. A Varian Trilogy with a Millennium120 MLC and a Varian Novalis with 120HD MLC were studied. A RW3 multi-slab phantom was irradiated with Gafchromic films inserted between slabs. An Expression 10000XL scanner (Seiko Epson Corp., Nagano, Japan) was used to digitalize the films. PTW-Verisoft software using the global Gamma Function (2%, 2 mm) was used to compare simulated and experimental results. The primary beam parameters were adjusted to best match reference data previously obtained in a water phantom. Static MLC simulations were performed to validate the MLC models in use. Two Dynamic IMRT preliminary tests were performed with leaves moving with constant and variable speed. A further test of an in phantom delivery of a real IMRT field allowed simulating a clinical-like MLC modulation. Simulated PDD, X- and Y-profiles in reference conditions showed respectively 100.0%, 100.0% and 99.4% of Gamma points < 1 (2%, 2 mm). Static MLC simulations showed 100.0% of Gamma points < 1 with the 120HD MLC and 99.1% with the Millennium compared with the scanned images. The fixed speed test showed 99.5 and 98.9% of Gamma points < 1 respectively with two different MLC configuration-sampling algorithms when the 120HD MLC was used. The higher modulation MLC motion simulation showed 99.1% of Gamma points < 1 with respect to the experimental. This result depends on the number of the fields to reproduce the MLC motion, as well as calculation time. The clinical-like simulation showed 96.2% of Gamma points < 1 using the same analysis conditions. The numerical model of the Varian Trilogy and Novalis in the PRIMO software was validated. The algorithms to simulate MLC motion were considered reliable. A clinical-like procedure was successfully simulated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 11 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,220,459
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#385
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,301
of 326,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.