↓ Skip to main content

The role of inflammation in the development of epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
415 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of inflammation in the development of epilepsy
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12974-018-1192-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amna Rana, Alberto E. Musto

Abstract

Epilepsy, a neurological disease characterized by recurrent seizures, is often associated with a history of previous lesions in the nervous system. Impaired regulation of the activation and resolution of inflammatory cells and molecules in the injured neuronal tissue is a critical factor to the development of epilepsy. However, it is still unclear as to how that unbalanced regulation of inflammation contributes to epilepsy. Therefore, one of the goals in epilepsy research is to identify and elucidate the interconnected inflammatory pathways in systemic and neurological disorders that may further develop epilepsy progression. In this paper, inflammatory molecules, in neurological and systemic disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's, Type I Diabetes, etc.) that could contribute to epilepsy development, are reviewed.Understanding the neurobiology of inflammation in epileptogenesis will contribute to the development of new biomarkers for better screening of patients at risk for epilepsy and new therapeutic targets for both prophylaxis and treatment of epilepsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 417 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 14%
Researcher 51 12%
Student > Bachelor 48 12%
Student > Master 26 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 56 13%
Unknown 151 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 67 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 6%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 172 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,194,330
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#297
of 2,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,583
of 326,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#7
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.